In the last post I meant that I use a blur layer so that I could focus more on the tone of the pages, similar to how the hyper leveling layer is used to check for dust. And the thing about contrast is due to me inexperience-ly trying to get everything to match up with the curve.

This time I think ...

Okay, hows this: https://litter.catbox.moe/q4o40q.7z
I tried to get over the whole soft/sharp thing by adding a blur layer over the whole image, might have axed page 84's contrast even further.

+ png for convenient in-browser viewing: https://litter.catbox.moe/580g5u.png

For the double page, it's not really due to the software but rather to my own limitations. page 84 looked softer (have less contrast) than 85 (due to all the warping I did while lining the pages up) which threw me off a bit. In the end I just gave up and copied the leveling values from one ...

Oh jeez, this one took a bit longer than I thought, but here is my second attempt:
m

I tried to keep the leveling to a reasonable amount and used the hyper leveling to find dust (my initial reaction after adding that layer was somewhat akin to a germophobe finding out that everything is covered ...

m
Note: I'm using a temporary files sharing site which only retain said files after a maximum of 3 days. if anyone need access to the files after the above time period by all means let me know. sorry for the inconveniences.

Name: Jm97
Availability: Every other day until college starts again ...

Aww yis it has return!

Link: m
Note: Since Gimp unfortunately doesn't fully support PS's text tool, all of the text layers was converted into raster image layers when I exported back to the .psd files. I have also included the .xcf files (Gimp 2.10 save files) of which I used to take the test.

Name: JS97
Availability ...